Shortly after the heated discussions about DNA Barcoding (Does it work? Is it science?...) abated people started to think about ways to apply it to existing challenges. Two parameters played a big role - cost and speed. Although prices for sequencing dropped over the last years a sequencing platform of any kind still represents quite an investment for a regular research lab, let alone the operating costs. The time it takes to obtain a sequence from a sample can be very short but this highly depends on equipment and workflows. Again, a small lab at a university usually doesn't provide results within a few hours. I am sure that readers with practical lab experience will also assent that it isn't easy to establish a new sequencing protocol in a lab and that it takes a while to have it run smoothly.
So, what do you do when you need fast, robust and reliable identifications of a handful of species that are not easy to distinguish based on morphology? Ah yes, it needs to be cheap as well.

1.7 Million DNA Barcodes for some 160,000 species have been assembled so far. The study ends with the following paragraph and there isn't much I could add to it.
"HRM analysis can utilise this barcoding resource for primer design and
provides a quick, efficient, low cost alternative to DNA sequencing for
species identification screening that could increase sampling
opportunities and possibilities. This has the potential to greatly expand the scope of research available
for both conservation genetics and fisheries management. The simplicity
of the technology required and the technique opens up the possibility
of routine genetic screening at remote locations such as research
stations and onboard ships."
![]() |
Macrourus whitsoni (source NIWA) |
No comments:
Post a Comment